Posts tagged as:

TestNG

Last week, I evaluated InfoStretch framework (ISFW) and Sauce on Demand (SOD) integration. My main concern was to test not only the integration, but also to verify parallel execution of test that is supported by ISFW and SOD. I found that it worked without any additional efforts along with all benefits of the framework including [...]

{ 2 comments }

InfoStretch Test Automation Framework Part-II

by Chirag Jayswal on January 9, 2011

InfoStretch test automation framework provides test page concept in a best efficient way by which you can manipulate page navigation same as on actual web application under test. Once page get created page objects/functionalities can be used in any test case, makes code more reusable. The framework takes care of not only launching that page [...]

{ 7 comments }

InfoStretch Test Automation Framework

by Chirag Jayswal on November 19, 2010

InfoStretch Test Automation Framework

{ 22 comments }

After my last post on integrating Selenium RC tests with Hudson,I had few folks asking me on how I organized my test execution code with selenium RC tests. If you are like me you probably started with running Selenium RC tests on your local machine and didn’t give much thought about integrating with Hudson,but when [...]

{ 0 comments }

In my last post about Hudson integration with Selenium RC,I talked about how to use Hudson to drive your Selenium RC tests.This configuration would work fine in most scenarios.However this is not a optimized configuration if you want to take advantage of executing your tests in parallel.For e.g if you have two machines in your [...]

{ 42 comments }

Integrating Selenium tests with Hudson CI

by rutvik on February 3, 2010

For most folks the challenge is that their CI system lives in some Unix environment and Selenium tests need to run on a Windows machine.To get this working I did the following My goal was to a)Have the test drive and report selenium tests from a single interface b)Ability to run it on different machines [...]

{ 19 comments }